Archive for March, 2006

2nd best day of m… no, maybe not

Wednesday, March 22nd, 2006

i FINALLY WON a game of settlers of catan!!

i must admit the game is quite nerdy, perhaps that is why i didn’t do well at it. because i’m too coooooool for it ;-)

so really quick… settlers is a game where you have settlements, roads, and cities. you collect wood, brick, sheep, ore, and wheat to build your things with. the board of the game is modular (composed of a bunch of hexagon pieces, representing the different resources, that can be arranged in different ways) with numberings that change position each game too so there’s a bunch of luck (roll of dice) involved, but also some strategy. anyone who knows me knows i hate thinking (common things yelled during a game “don’t think, just do!!”)… but somehow, for this game, it seems ok to think. (games are about the only time thinking is acceptable)

i’ve played approximately 981958198397985719891 8793195 times since being introduced to it. i had games where i had TWO points total (note to those unfamilar with the game: you start with 2 points). for the longest time, while everyone was all competitive with 8-9 points a game (first to 10 wins), i hovered around 3… maybe 5 points. i had a win in hand when i was ROBBED by may and in my stupidity to protect another card, my victory was STOLEN by julie. but tonight, i finally won!! … who cares if it was “just” against 3 others.

this ranks right up there with my best day of my life so far! … no, not quite. but pretty fun. i recommend the game, even to people who hate thinking like myself. anyone up for seafarers? i want to buy it and try it!!

best day of my life so far

Monday, March 20th, 2006

this was the best part of last week:

yay! gone.

birthday season

Monday, March 13th, 2006

it’s that time of the year again… birthday season! it seems most of the people i know are clustered around a few months. i know that’s stupid, especially given the nerdy CS/probability classes where we learn that it’s equally likely that people who have the same birthday/be clustered around the same time and yeah, given that there’s a whole world of people out there, it’s not unlikely to find clusterings for people. but still… i find my birthday seasons highly coincidental… popular months include january, march, july, and november. i know way too many people who share birthdays. so….

happy birthday to grandmas annE (or CB4) and changer banger! i was a bum and sent a happy birthday greeting BEFORE their birthdays because i suspected i wouldn’t rememer on their actual birthday. is that cheap? (because that’s what i did for january bdays… one card – “merry christmas! happy new years! … and happy birthday!!”)

happy birthday to cindy! you’re also old, but for the time being not that old since we’re the same age.

happy birthday to olivia! same applies.

happy birthday to jennifer, psycho, chubacca, and various friends’ friends/siblings/piano teacher/parents! best day of the year, imho ;-)

woohoo!

Friday, March 10th, 2006

after much stressing, i did it! new beginnings!

now the last stressful part, still need to figure out a way to tell the other group involved….

great television!

Friday, March 10th, 2006

television is starting to pickup/die down. either way, it’s an exciting time.

project runway had its finale. very excited to see who won. in the end, i thought all 3 were pretty good designers. i had my favorite to win, my favorite to lose, and liked the 3rd person too. but after seeing their lines, i actually liked a lot of the designs of my favorite to lose. my favorite to win was still pretty good but not impressive and the 3rd person was good too!! ahh, satisfying finale regardless of the contest outcome. (haha, trying not to spoil it for people who haven’t seen it yet)

beauty and the geek had its finale too. i missed the beginning of it coming home late, but caught the end. i think the eliminations aren’t as interesting as the stuff they do during normal episodes like the challenges or what they do during the day. so i thought this episode was good (’cause i wanted to know who won), but not as great as other episodes :-P

amazing race starting again. i started watching amazing race on the ikea episode a couple of seasons ago. but it hasn’t been as awesome since, especially with the family edition. but i have hope for this season! so far, the challenges have seem pretty interesting and the latest episode had everyone’s favorites – ascenders and manual transmission cars. man, i really need to learn how to drive stick!

top model started another cycle! doesn’t it seem like they just ended the previous cycle?

24/prison break – i’m not sure if i’m a fan of these shows but at least i kind of follow them.

sopranos is back after nearly 2 years!! i almost forgot all about this show. it’s actually a bit too scary for me, but so darn interesting that somehow i still get suckered into watching. i just watched the recap of season 5 on msn. man! i forgot all the things happening at the end of the season… got all excited again.

hrm… i’m kind of lacking in the comedy department. i kind of follow/tried to follow a bunch of sitcoms (the office, everybody hates chris, scrubs, how i met your mother, freddie, joey, according to jim) but none of them are terribly interesting. even the ones that i follow, i find myself not regularly downloading but more, downloading them in spurts whenever i’m lacking in my regular television programming… any suggestions on some good TV comedies?

facebook… what a time waster

Thursday, March 9th, 2006

so i logged into facebook, first time in awhile… been ignoring a lot of the emails that came in (which is usually the way i end up logging into facebook… when i get an email about a message or a friend request)

facebook sure has gotten bigger since i last logged in! lot more people with it…. not even sure how to stalk if i wanted to stalk because it’s just overwhelming!

i somehow ended up friends with a random black guy from Niagara (?? university? college? i don’t even know where it is!!) and have a friend request for another random dude from N.C. Central? i’m pretty sure we’re not friends, but i’m afraid to click reject because i’m unsure of how that works. and so, the friend requests stays unconfirmed. similarly, can i un-friend that random black guy? because i don’t think i should’ve confirmed our non-existent friendship considering we’ve never met.

and this is why facebook is scary. random people finding you and being your friends.

… and yet, it’s still so interesting to browse through. i just spent a hour randomly clicking through facebook :-)

Black. White…. chicks?

Wednesday, March 8th, 2006

anyone hear about this show? hahah, it sounds kind of like white chicks! i’m a bit curious to see how the show goes. the image of the transformed families looks pretty impressive!!

————————————————————————

black.white.white.black.

Life Swapper
With ‘Black. White,’ Producer R.J. Cutler Turns Up the Contrast on Race

By William Booth
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, March 8, 2006; C01

LOS ANGELES — R.J. Cutler appears to have gotten several of his knuckles into his mouth — he’s gnawing, gnawing, all nervous energy. As the lights go down in the theater on the Fox studio lot, the Emmy-winning producer of reality TV slides deeper into his seat, peers over the ballcap of Ice Cube, who is sitting in front of him, and awaits the verdict.

Cutler’s latest series is a “premise documentary” for Fox’s FX channel called “Black. White.” It employs the makeup magic of Hollywood to transform a white family into a black one and a black family into a white one, and then sends them out into L.A. to experience life in a different skin — all while being tracked by film crews or hidden cameras.

Cutler, who brought in Cube to co-produce (and do the intro rap song), is screening the first episode to an audience of several hundred members and guests of the Los Angeles NAACP chapter to get their reaction — and their approval. Because if these African American opinion-makers see in Cutler’s documentary some kind of exploitative minstrel show (as opposed to a serious yet entertaining examination of race), then he and Fox have a problem.

Pushing society’s blinking red warning lights is, in fact, often the point. Cutler has made his share of hot-button television.

In his reality series “30 Days,” hosted by Morgan Spurlock and also on FX, Cutler put a straight homophobe in the gay enclave of San Francisco’s Castro neighborhood; in one episode, he got a mom to binge-drink like her college student daughter; in another, he finds a fundamentalist Christian willing to live as a Muslim for a month.

Cutler’s publicist likes to describe her Harvard-educated client as “the thinking person’s Mark Burnett” (Burnett is the producer behind “Survivor” and “The Apprentice”). On Cutler’s shows, contestants don’t eat bugs.

He is a producer behind that rare subgenre: serious reality TV. His work includes “American High,” a cinema verite series on high school that aired in the first summer of the reality show boom in 2000 and won Cutler an Emmy. He followed with documentary-style examinations: “The Residents,” about medical students becoming doctors, and the more game-showy “American Candidate,” about the mechanics of running for office. (He’s also done fluff — like “Flip That House.”) But “Black. White,” which premieres tonight at 10 on FX, pushes the race button. A Variety critic described the show as “consistently compelling.” The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reviewer called it “thought-provoking, drama-filled.” Newsweek was less impressed: “at times it feels phony around the edges.”

What Cutler and his team did was hire two families, the (black) Sparkses from Atlanta and the (white) Wurgels from Santa Monica. They were chosen from among several hundred that applied to be on the show. They got paid — Cutler wouldn’t say how much, though typically six weeks’ work might get a reality participant $10,000 or so — and they got transformed. Or as Cutler likes to call it, “they went on a journey.” They switch races thanks to the sophisticated makeup talents of Keith Vanderlaan, whose credits include “Big Momma’s House” (Martin Lawrence turned into plump matron) and “White Chicks” (Wayans brothers turned into blond heiresses).

It is like a modern-day recasting of the mid-century classic “Black Like Me,” the 1961 book by white journalist John Howard Griffin, who used medications and dye to darken his skin and then traveled as a black man around the Jim Crow South.

The Wurgels and Sparkses spend up to five hours a day in the makeup chair, then are followed by a film crew or watched with hidden cameras as they do things like shop, apply for jobs, go to an all-white sports bar, a country music dance hall, a poetry slam class and a public park where black people are playing drums — all in the other race’s skin.

The two families live together, too, in a rented San Fernando Valley house during the six-week experiment — and they don’t seem to like each other very much, even though they were chosen for being, Cutler says, “openhearted” and “left-leaning” and hopeful about bridging the black-white divide.

At the NAACP screening, the majority-black audience in the Fox theater laughs — a lot. They applaud. They whoop. They appear very much impressed by the transformations — and literally gasp — when they see Carmen Wurgel, her teenage daughter Rose and Carmen’s live-in boyfriend, Bruno Marcotulli, as their hair is replaced with curly wigs and extensions, their features altered by prosthetics, their skin darkened. They look black. In the show, they pass. The black family, the Sparkses, transforms well, too, especially teen son Nick.

“We wanted to blow your mind right away with the transformation,” Cutler says. “Because that’s when the audience is making its own associations, about what they’re bringing to the series and their own feelings about race.”

This is a show that Cutler says he feels great passion for — and also seems a little defensive about, which is one of the reasons Ice Cube was brought in as co-producer.

According to Ice Cube, “my thing was making sure it wasn’t too stereotypical,” meaning he didn’t want the “whites” thrown into a ghetto or the “blacks” trying to get into an all-white country club.

About 15 minutes into the screening of “Black. White,” the audience stops laughing when Bruno starts using a racist slur. The camera cuts to Brian and Renee Sparks, who are wincing. Bruno tells the camera that he can’t wait for somebody to throw that word at him — while he is in blackface — so he can just shrug it off.

In real life, Bruno is a substitute teacher (and a sometime actor, with small parts on “Baywatch” and “JAG,” and the role of “sad mime” in the film “Spy Hard”). On TV, he is the one who makes the audience squirm (though Carmen does her share when she asks if she should talk in “jive” while black; in another scene she calls Renee a “bitch” but thinks that is friendly black slang). Bruno and Brian are always going at it, as Brian tells him that racism, in small ways and large, is alive and well, while Bruno says get over it, this is multicultural America, time to move on.

This is not Cutler’s take on race, which he calls “the defining issue in American society, history, culture. It’s where we’ve been, where we’re at now, where we’re going. There is no more important issue. You can’t run away from race in this country. It’s in our DNA. We must be talking about it; we must be thinking about it; we must be honest about it, aware of where we are in our great struggle to overcome racial divisions.”

Presenting issues and conflict in the format of reality television is something Cutler says he thinks about constantly. Strange as it might seem, Cutler says, reality TV is a great vehicle for exploring big questions.

Who is this guy? He’s pitching you, of course, but he also appears convinced that his show isn’t just mere entertainment, but something important. The man just exudes intent.

Cutler came out of Harvard, directed stage plays in Cambridge and New York and did a stint producing for NPR. Then in 1992 he heard a news segment on the radio about the improbable campaign of an Arkansas governor named Bill Clinton.

“I thought somebody ought to do a documentary about that,” Cutler says, and before he knew it, he and his producing partner were sitting down over a bottle of wine with master documentarian D.A. Pennebaker, who told them, “Look, if you can get us the money and the access, I’m in,” Cutler recalls. “And I’m thinking — is that all? Not knowing, as I do now, that money and access are everything.” Then he corrects himself. “That and storytelling, of course.”

The result was “The War Room,” the behind-the-scenes travails of characters who would become household names: James Carville, George Stephanopoulos, Paul Begala. The film was nominated for an Oscar in 1994.

Cutler followed up with “A Perfect Candidate,” about Oliver North’s run for the Senate. Then came his work in reality TV, which catapulted Cutler into the highly caffeinated, multitasking role of mega-producer, president and founder of Actual Reality TV.

A few days before the NAACP screening, Cutler let a reporter come over to his Sunset Boulevard offices. The architecture is artist loft, the dress code low-slung jeans, T-shirt and hip shoes. The staffers eat lunch at their desks, and it is exhausting just watching Cutler, who carries a notebook printed with the words “READ ME READ ME READ ME.”

In rapid order, over the next two hours, Cutler sits at the head of a conference table, thumbing his PDA, taking calls, getting briefed on the progress of the shows in development, shows being cast, shows in pre-production, shows being shot. They’re finalizing episodes of “30 Days” and discussing the insurance implications of having someone walk over hot coals. They’re booking crews in India. Now he is signing checks. Now they’re talking about “Level 5 background checks” for possible characters in an upcoming series.

Cutler takes a call from a network executive. “Let’s just make the damn show,” he says, mock frustrated. Then: “I’m so thrilled to be working with you!”

Afterward, someone reviews tape they shot “of bantering addicts.” That’s another show in development.

Cutler tells his team about the success they’re having getting “Thin,” the HBO-financed Laura Greenfield documentary about eating disorders and body image, into film festivals. One of his casting producers updates Cutler on a show they’re doing for CBS with personal finance coach Dave Ramsey of “Total Money Makeover.” She tells him one character “belongs on a reality show” and Cutler asks, “Why, is she inside out?” meaning does she exude, will she reveal? “She’s the boss. She’ll give Dave the most trouble.” That is good; that is conflict.

Then the casting producer tells Cutler “you’ll love this,” and relates how she got pulled over for speeding on the way home from the casting sessions. The cop let her go with a warning, after she told him she was working in reality. Then the cop pulled her over again. To pitch her an idea for a show. “Really,” Cutler says. “What was it?”

“Socialites on skid row.”

Hmm, he says. He’ll pass.

At the end of the NAACP screening, to Cutler’s great relief, the audience approves. The consensus: It felt real, even though it was obviously as unreal as it could be, because you can’t make someone black or white. But you can give them a glimpse.

“We didn’t want to lie to America,” Ice Cube says. “But we didn’t want it to be boring either.” Ice Cube says the show doesn’t end on a happy note.

That was obvious at the NAACP screening. In a Q&A afterward, Bruno asks the audience if there isn’t such a thing as black racism towards whites. Then Brian says to him: “After six weeks of dealing with you and the Brunos out there — this is why America is so screwed up.”

Afterward, Bruno and Brian stand together for a few minutes. “We can still have a drink together. We can still work together for the good of show,” says Bruno.

“As long as we don’t talk about race,” Brian says. “That’s the ground rule we don’t break.”
© 2006 The Washington Post Company

from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/07/AR2006030701831.html

another obsessed fan

Tuesday, March 7th, 2006

a lot of people say i’m obsessed with george. that’s just not true. i don’t think about him a lot of the times and i’ve never dreamed about him.

a couple of times, tina has mentioned how she thinks about george at work…. how she can hear his voice calling her name or how when someone mentions the name george, she automatically thinks of my monkey.

and now this…. a conversation with my friend:
Shruti1019: i had a weird dream
Shruti1019: and u were in part of it
Shruti1019: we were walking along somewhere…on the street and u wanted to go one way and i wanted to go the other..and i started walking and i pointed out to u…and ure like what…and there was lifesize curious george and georgina walking down the street
Shruti1019: lol
monkeyingatwork: hahahahaha
monkeyingatwork: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
monkeyingatwork: it reminds me of that time after track in high school?
Shruti1019: hehe they were CUTE
Shruti1019: but he was not wearing yellow, he was wearing red
monkeyingatwork: when we were bored and feeling weird, and we were at the intersection of two hallways looking back and forth and trying to decide where to go
Shruti1019: what happened in hs? oh lol yeah
monkeyingatwork: and then canham came out and saw us…..
Shruti1019: and canham caught us
Shruti1019: hehehe
Shruti1019: that was soooo bad
monkeyingatwork: and then she asked my sister why I was always so confused :-[
Shruti1019: awww
monkeyingatwork: hehe, lifesize curious george :-D
monkeyingatwork: you know, I think you’re obsessed with my monkey
monkeyingatwork: you’re dreamimg about him
Shruti1019: lol
Shruti1019: it was sooo random!
monkeyingatwork: it’s ok shruti
monkeyingatwork: george won’t get weirded out
monkeyingatwork: he has a lot of obsessed fans

my monkey is so popular!

D’oh! More know Simpsons than Constitution

Wednesday, March 1st, 2006

Study: America more familiar with cartoon family than First Amendment
The Associated Press
Updated: 1:22 a.m. ET March 1, 2006

CHICAGO – Americans apparently know more about “The Simpsons” than they do about the First Amendment.

Only one in four Americans can name more than one of the five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment.

But more than half can name at least two members of the cartoon family, according to a survey.

The study by the new McCormick Tribune Freedom Museum found that 22 percent of Americans could name all five Simpson family members, compared with just one in 1,000 people who could name all five First Amendment freedoms.

Joe Madeira, director of exhibitions at the museum, said he was surprised by the results.

“Part of the survey really shows there are misconceptions, and part of our mission is to clear up these misconceptions,” said Madeira, whose museum will be dedicated to helping visitors understand the First Amendment when it opens in April. “It means we have our job cut out for us.”

The survey found more people could name the three “American Idol” judges than identify three First Amendment rights. They were also more likely to remember popular advertising slogans.

It also showed that people misidentified First Amendment rights. About one in five people thought the right to own a pet was protected, and 38 percent said they believed the right against self-incrimination contained in the Fifth Amendment was a First Amendment right, the survey found.

The telephone survey of 1,000 adults was conducted Jan. 20-22 by the research firm Synovate and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

_________________________________________________________

Editor’s note: The five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment are freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and petition for redress of grievances.

© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

from: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11611015/?GT1=7850